![]() ![]() A Frida script to disable SSL certificate pinning in a target application An interactive TLS-capable intercepting HTTP proxy for penetration testers and software developers. A desktop debugging platform for mobile developers. A lightweight and powerful iOS framework for intercepting HTTP/HTTPS Traffic. List of libraries, tools and APIs for web scraping and data processing.When comparing Proxyman and grpc-tools you can also consider the following projects: The standalone app based on official debugger of React Native, and includes React Inspector / Redux DevTools A list of free, public, forward proxy servers. Connect with http, gRPC, WebSocket and MQTT Command Line Interface for *.http and *.rest files. When comparing Proxyman and httptoolkit you can also consider the following projects: But I guess I can see why some like postman etc for exploration - so far i prefer swagger for that (or soapui for xml/soap - preferably running soapui under httpkit for the best of both worlds). I feel like postman etc is closer to println Debugging, while just intercepting the traffic is more like using a real debugger. Strongly considering purchasing httpkit - but so far I've just needed it occasionally. I don't know about altering requests "in flight" - I typically re-issue the request via curl or my application server (eg: rails console or debugger breakpoint). I find that httpkit (or just mitmproxy) often gives me decent insight to the actual requests. Either before or after a request is executed to add to the headers or parameters of the request or getting the results of the request. > One of the issues I found with http clients I looked into is that they often don't provide enough functionality to hook into the request process. Different response Httpie vs Httpx ( python ). ![]() Works well, lets you stay 100% open source, which is good for everybody and encourages contributions, and you can still make enough money to fund development (never going to make anybody a billionaire, but that's not the point). ) but it's a non-trivial hassle to fork everything and hook it all up, and means ongoing maintenance work to manage a fork forever, so at the price it's not really worth any serious professional's time (and I give out free licenses for everybody would contributes to the code anyway). Yes, anybody can fork the project and remove the payment checks (here. comfortably enough income as a solo bootstrapped project that I can work on open source full time) doing a freemium approach that's 100% open-source for This point is interesting, because it assumes the only way to do premium is with a closed-source version, losing the open-source benefits. > Monetization via Paid Premium Version / Open Core
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |